AEB,Autonomous Emergency Braking & Collision Mitigation Testing


VBOX GPS data logging systems are ideal for the development, testing and validation of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Forward Collision Warning (FCW).

AEB and FCW are necessary features if a new passenger vehicle is to achieve a five-star Euro NCAP rating. By 2018 AEB and Lane Departure Warning systems will be mandatory for all new commercial vehicles throughout Europe (UNECE Regulation on AEBS steps 1 and 2).

VBOX equipment provides positional accuracy to 2cm along with a real-time output of the relevant parameters required to develop such systems. When used in conjunction with Euro NCAP-approved steering and pedal robots, the VBOX 3i RTK (VB3iSLR) outputs data that meets the requirements set out in the NCAP assessment.

The dedicated VBOX Test Suite plugin for Euro NACP AEB allows you to significantly reduce time spent on track and in post-processing.

Key Features
• Euro NCAP-compliant logging rate (100 Hz) and positional accuracy ±2 cm
• Robot Integration - Compatible with driverless robot systems
• Real-time feedback - Live Displays for Driver Guidance
• Dedicated AEB Test Software for Euro NCAP CCRs, CCRb and CCRm
• Video Integration - Synchronise video with data
• Vehicle Mapping - Up to 24 points around the vehicle body can be surveyed
• Open Road AEB Testing - 500m vehicle to vehicle range
• AEB/FC warning signals via CAN - Log CAN Data
• Easy to transport and install
• Relocate the VBOX - Secure on EVT
• Low latency

Measured Parameters
• Speed of target and subject vehicle (0.1km/h RMS)
• Longitudinal separation (0.02m RMS)
• Lateral separation (0.02m RMS)
• Time to collision (0.05s)
• Yaw rate for target and subject vehicle
• Angle to target vehicle (0.1º RMS)
• AEB/FC warning signal output

For a list of all standard GPS data channels and accuracies that are also measured please refer to the VBOX 3i RTK product page.

Robot Integration
AEB,Autonomous Emergency Braking & Collision Mitigation Testing
Meeting the Euro NCAP standards successfully requires the use of steering and pedal robots to maintain accurate conditions for speed, drive line, distance and braking as laid out in the test requirements.

VBOX equipment can be used with officially approved robots manufactured by providers such as Anthony Best Dynamics and VEHICO to achieve the necessary level of consistency, essential when conducting such tests.

Below are two examples of FCW test being carried out, where the aim is to achieve a separation between the two vehicles of 30m whilst they are both travelling at 72.5km/h. The speed of the two vehicles is represented by the red and blue traces, whilst the separation is shown in green.

The above graph shows a test performed by two experienced human drivers.
The down shows a similar test, but with the speed and separation being controlled by the VBOX and brake/acceleration robot.

Dedicated AEB Software Plugin within VBOX Test Suire
VBOX Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is a free software plugin for VBOX Test Suite. It includes all three types of Euro NCAP tests: car-to-car rear stationary, car-to-car rear moving, and car-to-car rear braking (CCRs, CCRm, CCRb).

The NCAP protocol's test parameters for AEB are hard-coded into the VBOX Test Suite software, and all the relevant channels are automatically created and logged during a test: subject and target vehicle speeds, relative distances between them, lateral deviation, yaw and steering wheel velocity.

VBOX Test Suite AEB processes the data according to the boundaries set out in the Euro NCAP protocol. Every run clearly shows whether each test condition is within tolerance, and a pass/fail for the test as a whole.

This level of automation results in a significant reduction in post-processing work as well as the time already saved on track.

Real Time Feedback for Driver Guidance
AEB Live DisplayCommunicating via radio the VBOX systems are able to display live readings of speed, yaw rate, longitudinal range and the all-important lateral range (the most difficult criteria to fulfil to NCAP standards) - with user configurable thresholds - so that the vehicle-under-test driver has the ability to maintain a consistent path. This immediate display of results also effectively allows engineers to gain instant pass/fail feedback, greatly speeding up the development process and reducing costs.

Relocate the VBOX to the EVT
Under EURO NCAP test recommendations the measurement system (VBOX) should be placed in the towing car, but due to the position of the EVT - at th end of a 26m towing rig - its lateral position can differ substanstially. This could be caused by simple factors like worn rollers, road camber or side winds, that can result in the +/- 10cm lateral range tolerance outlined by NCAP being exceeded and thus invalidating the results. The solution is to mount the VBOX inside a secure Peli case on the rear of the EVT itself. This ensures that the measurements taken by the VBOX accurately reflect the true position projected by the tow vehicle ahead.

Video Integration
FCWS screenshot v2When used in conjunction with Video VBOX or VBOX HD, the measured parameters can be graphically overlaid in real time onto the recorded video, providing a clear visual reference to the performance of the test.

Graphical overlay is totally user configurable and can be easily altered to present relevant information according to the tests being conducted.

Multiple Contact Points
It is now possible to ‘map' the shape of vehicles using a survey pole, antenna, and VBOX Manager. Up to twenty-four points around the vehicle bodies can be surveyed, and the ‘shape' of each car can be stored for later use. As the test is conducted, the distance of the closest contact points between the vehicles is calculated to +/-2cm accuracy, automatically switching to the nearest contact points as they change with the car's relative positions.

This allows for multiple procedures to be completed without having to reconfigure for individual contact points – such as moving from right rear to left rear flank during blind spot testing. This video demonstrates how the system works:


Open Road AEB Testing
By substituting the DGPS Base Station with a specially configured VBOX 3i Dual Antenna with RTK, our MOVING BASE test setup allows users to test and verify active safety systems outside the test track. VBOX Moving Base enables you to ...

• Conduct realistic testing amongst other road users and roadside architecture
• Test over a large area
• Measure with relative positional accuracy between subject and target vehicle of under 5 cm
• Maintain RTK lock between VBOX units with up to 600m of vehicle separation in good conditions

AEB / Collision warning signals
If the vehicle carries the AEB / FCWS operation data on its CAN Bus, this can be simultaneously logged (and displayed in video if a Video VBOX is also being used) alongside that of the GPS data, giving you an exact comparison between relative vehicle position and onboard strategy data.

Test Procedures
VBOX systems are suitable for the following test scenarios:
• ISO 15623 for Forward Vehicle Collision Warning Systems
• NHTSA NCAP Forward Collision Warning System confirmation test
• Euro NCAP Autonomous Emergency Braking

Testing to Euro NCAP
The Euro NCAP standard defines three test procedures:

Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs)
Vehicle travels towards another stationary vehicle

Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm)
Vehicle travels towards another vehicle travelling at constant speed

Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb)
Vehicle travels towards another vehicle travelling at constant speed and then decelerates

AEB systems that work at lower speeds, referred to as AEB City, only have to be tested for CCRs. AEB systems that work at higher speeds, AEB Inter-Urban, need to be tested in all three test scenarios.

Instead of a target vehicle the Euro NCAP soft target (EVT) should be used (see picture).

The subject vehicle follows a soft target (EVT) towed by another vehicle, with a range of closing velocities.
Once the test conditions are met, the towing vehicle brakes at a constant deceleration whilst the test vehicle's AEB system should detect this and apply the brakes.

In order to perform this procedure efficiently, robots should be used. VBOX test systems are compatible with ABD steering and pedal robots, and VEHICO systems.
The test starts when the TTC is 4s and the SV and EVT have been accelerated to the specified test speed. Test is valid when the below conditions are met.
• Speed of SV: Test speed +1.0 km/h
• Speed of soft target: Test speed ±1.0 km/h
• Lateral deviation from test path: 0 ± 0.1 m
• Yaw velocity: 0 ±1.0 °/s
• Steering wheel velocity: 0 ±15.0 °/s
• Relative distance between SV and soft target (CCRb): 12 m or 40 m ± 0.5 m
The test ends when the SV's speed is 0 km/h, smaller than the speed of the soft target or there has been contact between SV and soft target.

Testing to NHTSA NCAP
Three test procedures are specified in the NHTSA NCAP Forward Collision Warning Confirmation

1) Subject Vehicle (SV) encounters stopped Principal Other Vehicle (POV) on a straight road
2) SV encounters decelerating POV
3) SV encounters slower POV

Test 1 - Stationary POV

This test evaluates the ability of the FCW function to detect a stopped lead vehicle. In order to pass the test, the FCW alert must be issued when the time-to-collision (TTC) is at least 2.1 seconds.

The FCW system must satisfy the TTC alert criteria for at least five of the seven test trials.

Test 2 - Decelerating POV

The subject vehicle (blue) follows the target vehicle (orange) at a constant time gap. The test evaluates the ability of the FCW to recognise a decelerating lead vehicle and to issue an alert to SV driver in a timely manner.

In order to pass the test, the FCW alert must be issued when the time-to-collision (TTC) is at least 2.4 seconds.

Test 3 - Slower POV

The test evaluates the ability of the FCW to recognise a slower lead vehicle being driven at a constant speed and issue a timely alert.

In order to pass the test, the FCW alert must be issued when the time-to-collision (TTC) is at least 2 seconds.

Testing to ISO 15623
ISO 15623 defines three test procedures:

1) Detection Zone Tests

Determines if the FCW system detects a test target when it's in the system's detection range and measures the separation when it's in measurement range.

2) Warning Distance Accuracy Tests

Determines if the FCW systems issues a warning at the distance it states to do it.

The subject vehicle is driven towards the target at the maximum vehicle speed at which the FCW system is able to operate. The warning distance is measured at the minimum detectable distance (t0), and when the warning is issued (t1). The distance at which the warning signal occurred (D) is then compared to the warning distance specified by the manufacturer.

3) Target Discrimination Tests

Involves two or more obstacle vehicles and determines whether the FCW system is able to identify the (closest) vehicle in the subject vehicle's trajectory.

3a) Straight road longitudinal discrimination

The subject vehicle follows two target vehicles at the maximum speed the FCWS is capable of operating. The nearer target vehicle shall not mask the other.

The subject vehicle (blue) accelerates until it produces a preliminary warning, then decelerates until warning stops and keeps speed. Then, the nearer target vehicle decelerates until the subject vehicle (blue) produces a warning.

The test is successfully fulfilled if the subject vehicle has produced a warning.

3b) Straight road lateral discrimination

Two vehicles (orange/ green) travel alongside at the maximum speed the FCWS is capable of operating. The spacing between the longitudinal centrelines of the cars is 3.5m ± 0.25m.

The subject vehicle (blue) follows the target vehicles (orange) at the same speed. The lateral displacement between subject vehicle and the target vehicle shouldn't be more than 0.5m measured from their longitudinal centreline.

First the forward vehicle decelerates (green). Then, the target vehicle (orange) decelerates until it's in the detection range of the subject vehicle's FCWS.

The test is successful when the subject vehicle issues a warning signal for the second scenario and doesn't react to the first.

3c) Curved road lateral discrimination

FCW lateral-target-discrimination-curved-roadThe same test is conducted on a circle or a sufficient part of a circle with a curve radios specified by the ISO systems classifications.

The test is successful when the subject vehicle doesn't issue a warning when the forward vehicle (green) decelerates, and issues a preliminary collision warning when the target vehicle decelerates.

3d) Overhead discrimination

A test target which may cause false warnings is installed at a height defined according to the road standard of each country. The subject vehicle approaches the test target.
The test is successful if the subject vehicle has not produced a warning.